I sat in on a grad seminar the other day that presented lots of data, and whose “Goals” slide started with the words “To find out if….”. Much of the resulting input from the audience was of the sort: “Could your data suggest that..?”.
Reminds me of a story. A critic said that Darwin, in writing Origin, should have just “put his facts before us and let them rest”.
“About thirty years ago there was much talk that geologists ought only to observe and not theorize, and I well remember someone saying that at this rate a man might as well go into a gravel-pit and count the pebbles and describe the colours. How odd it is that anyone should not see that all observation must be for or against some view if it is to be of any service!”
The best science is communicated as a narrative, a voyage of discovery, that presents your data in the light of different cool hypotheses.
That’s three parts to communicating science.
Data and hypothesis without a narrative ignores the fact that humans learn from stories.
Data and narrative without hypotheses is like watching a slide show from a stranger’s cross-country trip (”Where is this going fercryin’ out loud!?”).
Hypotheses and narrative without data is like an evening listening to free verse.
h/t Michael Shermer, Scientific American, October 2007